Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 20:01:54 CDT
Hi, Mike: I think it would be good to indicate that the 1500 m plot is our "baseline". Cheers. Dave.
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Shaevitz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Thursday, June 2, 2005 12:34 pm
Subject: Corrected: Sensitivity vs Far Detector Systematics
> Prompted by a question at NuSAG from Natalie Roe, I have
> looked at our sensitivity vs. far detector location (See
> attached plot - red line is at 0.005). To me, it looks like
> for any dm2 value between 0.0013 and 0.0030 eV^2, our 1500 m
> is a good choice. If dm2 is shown to be greater than
> 0.0022, one might want to go closer to get a better shape
> measurement. It is fairly obvious that going to larger
> distances has no advantage.
> I was thinking of sending these plots to Natalie (and Peter
> Meyers), so let me know if you have comments.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 03:10:14 CDT